Gonzales v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where the defendant gave testimony that revealed he had a sufficient command of English to participate meaningfully in the proceedings without an interpreter
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where the defendant gave testimony that revealed he had a sufficient command of English to participate meaningfully in the proceedings without an interpreter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Selalla
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-01-02· cited 11×
• Appling v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-04-17· cited 7×
• Hersi v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-08-16· cited 6×
• Meja v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-05-14· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hensley v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1972-01-06· cited 44×
• Reed v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-02-17· cited 28×
• LaCount v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-06-23· cited 20×
• Bone v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-04-10· cited 8×