Tenth Circuit· 5/6/1999
Gonzales v. Hernandez
Citations
- 175 F.3d 1202
- 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2787
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8606
- 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,902
- 1999 WL 278910
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that \the general weight of authority\ is that a government employee sued in his official capacity stands in privity with his employer
- explaining government employees are in privity with their employer in their official capacities, but not in their individual capacities
- “The general weight of authority appears to be that while government employees are in privity with their employer [when sued] in their official capacities, they are not in privity [when sued] in their individual capacities.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Anderson, Briscoe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Salguero v. City of ClovisTenth Circuit· 2004-05-06· cited 136×
- Dodge v. Cotter CorporationTenth Circuit· 2000-02-11· cited 90×
- Harrison v. Eddy Potash, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2001-04-30· cited 46×
- Melnor, Inc. v. Corey (In Re Corey)Tenth Circuit· 2008-10-06· cited 17×
- Bertone v. Wormington (In re Wormington)W.D. Oklahoma· 2016-08-12· cited 17×
- M.J. Ex Rel. Beebe v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2013-07-01· cited 10×
- Aviation Software, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-12-05· cited 9×
- Klaassen v. AtkinsonD. Kansas· 2018-09-28· cited 8×
- Buhendwa v. Regional Transportation DistrictD. Colorado· 2015-03-10· cited 7×
- In re Picacho Hills Utility Co.D. New Mexico· 2014-09-17· cited 7×
- Nichols v. DanleyD. New Mexico· 2003-05-12· cited 5×
- Vista Manufactured Home Community, L.P. v. Rodriguez (In re Rodriguez)D. New Mexico· 2015-02-04· cited 3×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 3,103×
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1980-03-03· cited 1,332×
- Gray v. LackeSeventh Circuit· 1989-09-22· cited 275×
- Pam Pino v. E.P. Higgs, Curt Faust, Marcella Wolf, Jim Naranjo, Harlan Weiss, Pablo HernandezTenth Circuit· 1996-02-05· cited 149×
- Donald Roy, of Waterville, Kennebec County, State of Maine v. The City of Augusta, MaineFirst Circuit· 1983-07-28· cited 146×
- Headley v. BaconEighth Circuit· 1987-09-09· cited 122×
- Three Rivers Land Co., Inc. v. MaddouxNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-09-28· cited 89×
- Dorothy Willner v. Gene Budig, F. Allan Hanson, Alfred E. Johnson, Robert L. Lineberry, Robert J. Smith, and Deanell TachaTenth Circuit· 1988-08-18· cited 69×
- Kepler v. SladeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-05-24· cited 60×
- Ford v. New Mexico Department of Public SafetyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-11-30· cited 56×
- Anaya v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-07-26· cited 47×
- Kimmel v. Iowa Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1983-10-19· cited 45×
- Behrmann v. Phototron Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-07-18· cited 31×
- Daddow v. Carlsbad Municipal School DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-05-02· cited 24×
- Carter v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-03-08· cited 21×
- Day v. DavidsonWyoming Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 18×
- McIlravy v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Tenth Circuit· 1997-07-28· cited 10×
- Bills Ex Rel. Bills v. Hommer Consolidated School District Number 33-CN.D. Illinois· 1997-03-14· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.