Gonzales v. Conagra Grocery Products Co. (In Re Furr's Supermarkets, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order of a bankruptcy court concluding a preference action was a final, appealable order
• holding that “an action which will generate funds for the payment of administrative claims such as these is a proper use of Trustee’s avoiding and recovery powers”
• finding benefit to the estate to be interpreted more broadly than payment to unsecured creditors
• defendant “is entitled to ‘the maximum effect of the defenses’ ”
• “it does not take an expert to create graphs and summarize data”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).