Skip to main content
· 9/10/2015

Gonzales, Jose G

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e have held that a failure to anticipate a change or advancement in the law does not qualify as ineffective assistance.”
  • “[W]e have held that a failure to anticipate a change or advancement in the law does not qualify as ineffective as- sistance.”
  • “[A] failure to anticipate a change or advancement in the law does not qualify as ineffective assistance.”
  • “[A] failure to anticipate a change or advancement in the law does not qualify as ineffective assistance.”
  • “[W]e have held that a failure to anticipate a change or advancement in the law does not qualify as ineffective assistance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.