Skip to main content
· 3/15/2006

Gonser v. State

Citations

  • 843 N.E.2d 947
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 544
  • 2006 WL 626182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting well-established rule that court on appeal may not consider evidence or arguments not properly presented to the trial court
  • stating “we will affirm the trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress if it is sustainable on any legal theory supported by the record, even if the trial court did not use that theory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Riley, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.