Skip to main content
· 1/17/2002

Gondelman v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

Citations

  • 789 A.2d 1238
  • 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 11
  • 2002 WL 58480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although, as an original matter, we might or might not agree with the Mayor’s Agent’s 17 interpretation of the Act, we cannot say that [the] interpretation is unreasonable [or] inconsistent with the language of the Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwelb, Farrell, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.