· 1/17/2002
Gondelman v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs
Citations
- 789 A.2d 1238
- 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 11
- 2002 WL 58480
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although, as an original matter, we might or might not agree with the Mayor’s Agent’s 17 interpretation of the Act, we cannot say that [the] interpretation is unreasonable [or] inconsistent with the language of the Act.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb, Farrell, Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.