Gonannies, Inc. v. Goupair. Com, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that six-month delay in filing motion from discovery of infringing conduct was not justified, even when plaintiff filed the motion “only after settlement negotiations had soured.”
• finding that plaintiffs’ delay in moving for preliminary injunction six months after discovering allegedly infringing use and five months after filing suit rebutted presumption of irreparable harm
• finding that a delay of over six months rebutted any presumption of irreparable harm
• finding that a delay of over six months rebutted any presumption of irreparable harm
• finding that a delay of over six months rebutted any presumption of irreparable harm
• denying preliminary injunction where plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence to demonstrate that any threat of irreparable injury could not be adequately compensated by monetary damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).