California Court of Appeal· 8/1/1983
Gomez v. Ticor
Citations
- 145 Cal. App. 3d 622
- 193 Cal. Rptr. 600
- 1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 1996
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “the deserted ... nature of these structures, especially at night, makes them likely places for robbers and rapists to lie in wait”
- ‘‘in cases where the burden of preventing future harm is great, a high degree of foreseeability may be required’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schauer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-16· cited 411×
- Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1984-09-10· cited 317×
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-02-28· cited 274×
- Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2004-05-06· cited 262×
- Mellon Mortgage Co. v. HolderTexas Supreme Court· 1999-12-02· cited 239×
- Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-09-06· cited 208×
- Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-12-31· cited 193×
- Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court· 1997-05-08· cited 175×
- Delgado v. Trax Bar & GrillCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-06-30· cited 167×
- Sharon P. v. Arman, Ltd.California Supreme Court· 1999-12-16· cited 142×
- Vasquez v. Residential Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-05-04· cited 96×
- Cottle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-02-26· cited 88×
- Lopez v. McDonald's Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1987-07-09· cited 82×
- NOLA M. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-06-09· cited 62×
- Southland Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-08-05· cited 48×
- Holder v. Mellon Mortgage Co.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-11-26· cited 47×
- Small v. McKennan HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-03-08· cited 44×
- Security Pacific National Bank v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-03-03· cited 41×
- Cohen v. Southland Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1984-06-14· cited 40×
- McCormick v. Sentinel Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-03-29· cited 36×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-08-08· cited 1,329×
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1975-08-21· cited 329×
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court· 1974-08-21· cited 260×
- Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 202×
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-02-18· cited 199×
- Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-06-25· cited 162×
- Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 155×
- Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1966-08-15· cited 109×
- Slobojan v. Western Travelers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-02-20· cited 84×
- 7735 Hollywood Boulevard Venture v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-03-16· cited 55×
- Totten v. More Oakland Residential Housing, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1976-11-10· cited 48×
- Kwaitkowski v. Superior Trading Co.California Court of Appeal· 1981-09-01· cited 41×
- Nevarez v. Thriftimart, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1970-05-20· cited 30×
- Musgrove v. Ambrose PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-12-06· cited 29×
- Rogers v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-03-18· cited 23×
- Wingard v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1981-07-29· cited 14×
- Jamison v. Mark C. Bloome Co.California Court of Appeal· 1980-11-25· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.