Skip to main content
· 3/15/2024

Gomez v. Super. Ct.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing three bases for equitable tolling that are to be “applied sparingly” (quoting Ramirez v. City of San Antonio, 312 F.3d 178, 183 (5th Cir. 2002))
  • “The limitations period for filing a discrimination charge with the EEOC is not a jurisdictional prerequisite, and it may be tolled by equitable modification.”
  • “Our review of a district court’s application of equitable tolling is for abuse of discretion.”
  • “The limitations period for filing a discrimination charge with the EEOC is not a jurisdictional prerequisite, and it may be tolled by equitable modification.” (citations omitted)
  • “Generally, the limitations period begins on the date of the alleged unlawful employment action.”
  • stating the same under the ADEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.