Skip to main content

Gomez v. State

Citations

  • 15 Tex. Ct. App. 64
  • 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 75

Syllabus

<p>Possession op Recently Stolen Property—Charge op the Court.— While the statute provides that possession of an animal recently stolen, without a written bill of sale specifically describing the animal, shall be deemed prima facie evidence of illegal possession,-it is error to so charge in the abstract. The trial court should instruct the jury that, though the failure to produce a written conveyance is prima faoie evidence of illegal possession, yet it is not conclusive, and may be rebutted by competent evidence.</p>

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.