District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/10/2017
Gomez v. State
Citations
- 220 So. 3d 495
- 2017 WL 1929685
- 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Florida Communications Fraud Act sets forth two separate offenses—‘organized fraud’ under section 817.034(4)(a) and ‘communications fraud’ under section 817.034(4)(b).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Emas, Fernandez, Rothenberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 1,790×
- Novaton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-03-24· cited 172×
- Pizzo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-21· cited 112×
- McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-06-16· cited 25×
- Jermaine D. English v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-05-12· cited 22×
- Fernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-02· cited 19×
- Holubek v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-28· cited 13×
- Godfrey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-28· cited 11×
- State of Florida v. Timothy W. Tuttle, Jr.Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-11-12· cited 11×
- State v. LacayoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-04· cited 6×
- Raines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-27· cited 5×
- Muhammad v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-31· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.