Gomez v. Pechman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that prosecutor “violated [a] fundamental rule[]” by making remarks that “went outside the record”
• where counsel twice stated client was ready for trial, the “frequency and force of the objections” to rescheduling delays was “not strong” over an eleven month period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).