Gomez v. Matey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding allegations of “knowing” misrepresentation regarding necessity of hysterectomy a health care liability claim
• plaintiff required to prove a deviation from the accepted standard of medical care to prove the case, regardless of the artful way she pled the cause of action
• “Gomez was not required to produce any evidence in response to the appellee’s motion, but was required to provide pleadings that sufficiently state claims falling outside the purview of the MLIIA.”
• plaintiff required to prove a deviation from the accepted standard of medical care to prove the case, regardless of the artful way she pled the cause of action
• “Gomez was not required to produce any evidence in response to the appellee’s motion, but was required to provide pleadings that sufficiently state claims falling outside the purview of the MLIIA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).