Gomez v. Gomez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the absence of written findings explaining why ordering payment of child support guidelines would be unjust or inappropriate requires reversal of order dramatically deviating from guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Griffin v. Florida Parole Commission
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-03· cited 6×
• Peiman v. Peiman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-25· cited 6×
• Niemann v. Anderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-03· cited 4×
• Wehrum v. Wehrum
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-17· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Touchstone v. Touchstone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-13· cited 12×
• Pridgeon v. Pridgeon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-23· cited 8×
• Stewmon v. Stewmon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-28· cited 6×
• Martin v. Martin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-30· cited 6×
• Griffin v. Florida Parole Commission
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-03· cited 6×
• STATE, DEPT. OF H & R SERVICES v. Bush
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-19· cited 5×
• State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Norman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-23· cited 2×
• Didier v. Didier
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-05· cited 2×