Goluszek v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Title VII does not make all forms of harassment actionable and that Title VII is meant to correct abuses of power imbalances that result in discrimination against a discrete and vulnerable group
• relying on Goluszek in summarily holding that \harassment by a male does not state a claim under Title VII even though the harassment has sexual overtones\
• harassment of a male employee by male co-workers did not create an anti-male environment and did not present actionable sexual harassment under Title VII
• sexual harassment against male in male-dominated environment not actionable under Title VII because action would be inconsistent with Title VII’s goal of remedying discrimination and correcting imbalance of power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).