Golosh v. Cherokee Cab Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cab driver found to be employee, rather than independent contractor, where, although driver could “evade supervision,” the company could discharge the driver for failing to follow instructions
• “We have no hesitancy in holding that, nothing else appearing, this evidence as to the power to terminate the employment alone is sufficient evidence to authorize a finding that the cab company had the right to control the time, manner and method of doing the work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).