Golon v. Jenne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the State should anticipate these issues and should obtain a continuance if it needed additional time to develop evidence or research the law
• noting that the State should anticipate these issues and should obtain a continuance if it needed additional time to develop evidence or research the law
• “[L]ong-standing precedent provides that evidence derived from a search in violation of the Fourth Amendment must be excluded at a hearing determining whether the government has probable cause for forfeiture.”
• \[L]ongstanding precedent provides that evidence derived from a search in violation of the Fourth Amendment must be excluded at a hearing determining whether the government has probable cause for forfeiture.\
• validity of the stop and search are inextriably bound up with the probable cause determination required by the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).