Gollin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding testimony that photograph and physical description in pen packet was the defendant was sufficient
• holding testimony that photograph and physical description in pen packet was the defendant was sufficient
• holding testimony that photograph and physical description in pen packet was the defendant was sufficient
• holding testimony that photograph and physical description in pen packet was the defendant was sufficient
• holding testimony that photograph and physical description in pen packet was the defendant was sufficient
• holding State may prove prior conviction for enhancement purposes by matching photograph and physical description of defendant in pen packet to defendant at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).