Goldtrap v. Conner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because the substantive offense “required the participation of at least five persons,” it “necessarily follows that an aider and abettor could not be counted as one of the required 27 Rule 65(d
• person who allowed principals in a bookmaking operation to use her apartment and who received telephone messages for the principals was not a conductor of the business since her actions were merely helpful to the operation of the enterprise
• “In any case upon the appearance of any uncertainty or contingency in a jury’s verdict, it is the duty of the trial judge to resolve that doubt, for ‘[t]here is no verdict as long as there is any uncertainty or contingency to the finality of the jury’s determination.’”
• “Polling is one means of ensuring unanimity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).