Skip to main content
· 4/27/1896

Goldsworthy v. Boyle

Citations

  • 175 Pa. 246
  • 34 A. 630
  • 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1242

Syllabus

<p>Election law — Certificate of election — Contest—Evidence.</p> <p>Where there has been an authorized election for a public office the certificate of election which is sanctioned by law or usage is the prima faciewritten title to the office, and can be set aside only by a contest in the-forms prescribed by law.</p> <p>After the judges of election have issued a certificate of election to one-person, they have no power to issue another certificate to another person» for the same office.</p> <p>Public offices — Equity—Injunction quo warranto.</p> <p>A bill in equity will not lie to restrain a person from acting in a public-office. The remedy is at law by quo warranto.</p> <p>At an election for poor directors, the judges of election issued a certificate to C. and subsequently a certificate to L. for the same office. The-board of poor directors consisted of three persons, two of whom, G. and’ 11., held over. G. recognized L. as elected, and D. recognized O. as-elected. G. and L. filed a bill in equity against D., and the steward and' tax collector whom D. and C. had appointed. Held, (1) that the organization of the board by G. and D. was not a regular and legal organization, of the board; (2) that a court of equity had no jurisdiction to restrain Dl and C., who were acting as a de facto board, and had not undertaken to-dispose of any of the property of the school district wrongfully, or to do-any other act inconsistent with their duties as poor directors; (3) that equity had no jurisdiction to determine whether L. or C. had been properly-elected.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the directory.language “[t]he city treasurer ... shall pay all warrants duly countersigned” imbued the city treasurer, in a city organized pursuant to the Charter Law, with a ministerial duty
  • discerning neither illegal nor invalid acts, and affirming the mandamus court’s relief because treasurer’s duty to sign checks was ministerial and “the exceptions to compelling performance of a ministerial act set out in D.N. Corporation and Waters did not apply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.