Skip to main content
· 1/13/2009

Goldston v. Bandwidth Technology Corp.

Citations

  • 11 N.Y.3d 904
  • 901 N.E.2d 758
  • 873 N.Y.S.2d 264
  • 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e cannot say as a matter of law that the notation written on the check, ‘Ins. premiums to date,’ is ‘language of equivalent condition’ to ‘payment in full’ under the circumstances of this case.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.