Goldstein v. Wagner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Requiring that writings evincing a purported modification contain all of the “essential terms.”
• various signed and unsigned documents may be pieced together to fulfill the Statute of Frauds requirement
• “signed and unsigned writings [may] be read together, provided that they clearly refer to the same subject matter or transaction.”
• parol evidence and related documents may be used to satisfy Statute of Frauds
• “The statute of frauds does not require the memorandum to be in one document. It may be pieced together out of separate writings, connected with one another either expressly or by the internal evidence of subject matter and occasion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).