Skip to main content
· 3/31/1885

Goldstein v. Nunan

Citations

  • 66 Cal. 542
  • 6 P. 451
  • 1885 Cal. LEXIS 497

Syllabus

<p>Sale—Change oe Possession—Employment oe Vendob.—The employment hy the vendee of one of the vendors, after a sale of personal property, while tending to show a want of actual and continued change of possession, is not conclusive of the question, hut only an element of proof to he weighed hy the jury,</p> <p>Evidence—Error not Prejediciad.—The erroneous admission of evidence on an immaterial issue is not a prejudicial error justifying a reversal.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.