Goldstein v. Nola Cabs, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the appellant may have shown good cause where, through no fault of his own, he missed a bus to court
• explaining Pa.R.Crim.P. 720(D) barred defendant from filing post-sentence motions, where defendant was convicted of summary offense and received incarceration sentence
• remanding for a new trial de novo where the appellant attached an affidavit to his appellate brief indicating that his absence was not voluntary
• where appellant arrived ten minutes late due to missing bus and tardiness was not voluntary, appellant should have been given opportunity to present case
• where appellant arrived ten minutes late due to missing bus and tardiness was not voluntary, appellant should have been given opportunity to present case
• where appellant arrived ten minutes late due to missing bus and tardiness was not voluntary, appellant should have been given opportunity to present case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).