· 1/10/1992
Goldstein v. Kaestner
Citations
- 413 S.E.2d 347
- 243 Va. 169
- 8 Va. Law Rep. 1875
- 1992 Va. LEXIS 145
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that even though there was a change in ownership of supermarket, the day-to-day operations remained the same, so lost profits were recoverable
- holding the appropriate standard of review in a malpractice action where a timely appeal is not filed
- appropriate standard of review in legal malpractice cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keenan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.