Goldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the equitable claims of unjust enrichment and money had and received were subject to dismissal because the plaintiff had incorporated into both equitable claims the allegation that he and the defendant had entered into a contract
• dismissing an unjust enrichment claim where plaintiff incorporated his allegation that the parties entered into a contract into his claim for unjust enrichment
• plaintiff lacked standing to seek an injunction because “the injunction proposed by [the] plaintiff, if granted, would in no way benefit [the] plaintiff.”
• attached at Docket No. 52, Ex. A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).