Skip to main content
· 2/7/1977

Goldstein v. Denver Urban Renewal Authority

Citations

  • 560 P.2d 80
  • 192 Colo. 422
  • 1977 Colo. LEXIS 701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that an opposing party is able to introduce evidence of the differences between comparable sales and the condemned property, and that the fact finder may consider any and all differences, facts, or cir cumstances affecting the value of condemned property
  • “Both parties rely upon a court of appeals’ opinion which was not selected for official publication. C.A.R. 35(f

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.