Goldstein v. BRT, Inc. (In Re Universal Marketing, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the allegation that there is no record of a transaction bears no logical relationship to the issue of reasonably equivalent value
• finding that merely parroting the relevant statutory provision does “not provide a factual foundation that would permit a court to conclude that the complaint states a plausible claim for relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).