Goldstein v. Albert (In Re Albert)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to withdrawal where firm was “owed less than ten percent of what [had] been paid.”
• “Continuing failure to overcome obstacles of financial hardship in order to satisfy the obligation may strengthen an inference of the client’s lack of due regard for the obligation, thus more strongly supporting a finding of ‘deliberate disregard.’”
• “In comparison to what Goldstein says he has paid, the amount in question is small and has not been pending for very long.”
• “Non-payment of legal fees, without more, is not usually a sufficient basis to permit an attorney to withdraw from representation”
• “Non-payment of legal fees, without more, is not usually a sufficient basis to permit an attorney to withdraw from representation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).