Goldsmith v. Wamsganz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that in most PCR cases, our supreme court has \refused to excuse the pleading and issue-preservation requirements that apply in all civil cases\
• \[T]he interests of justice require . . . courts to be flexible with procedural requirements before PCR applicants suffer procedural default on substantial claims.\
• \We defer to a PCR court's findings of fact and will uphold them if there is any evidence in the record to support them.\
• \We do not defer to a PCR court's rulings on questions of law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).