· 7/5/1910
Goldsmith & Co. v. Marcus & Bros.
Citations
- 7 Ga. App. 849
- 68 S.E. 462
- 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 553
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff could recover under quantum meruit /unjust enrichment theory if it could show that it had performed work outside the scope of the original contract
- “Plaintiff was not precluded from bringing an action for breach of contract and, as alternative theories, quantum meruit and unjust enrichment”
- plaintiff may allege breach of contract and unjust enrichment alternatively
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bussell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.