Skip to main content
· 4/17/1916

Goldsleger v. Carracciolo

Citations

  • 63 Pa. Super. 72
  • 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 101

Syllabus

<p>Husband and wife — Guaranty and suretyship — Act of June 8, 1898, P. L. 8U.</p> <p>Where a dealer in taking an order asks whether he can ship the merchandise in the name of both the customer and the latter’s wife, and subsequently the dealer asks the wife whether he can ship in both names, and the wife replies, ‘Yes, me good for the goods,” the contract is one of guaranty or suretyship, and within the prohibition of the Act of June 8, 1898, P. L. 344.</p>

Judges: Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Rexler, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.