Goldschmidt v. Erickson (In Re Erickson)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate a personal injury tort claim
• noting that the bankruptcy court “has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate [the claim’s] discharge-ability once such claim is liquidated”
• stating that, although bankruptcy court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate personal-injury tort claim, it has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate dischargeability once the claim has been liquidated
• deciding the dischargeability of a claim based on sexual assault and false imprisonment
• “In light of the fact that this court cannot liquidate the discrimination claim, it is readily apparent that the movant is entitled to relief from stay so that she may liquidate the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).