Tennessee Supreme Court· 7/19/1929
Goldsby v. State
Citations
- 19 S.W.2d 241
- 159 Tenn. 396
- 6 Smith & H. 396
- 1928 Tenn. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- correctly stating that “the exercise of [a judge’s] discretion will not be reviewed unless arbitrary”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swiggart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1983-03-31· cited 23×
- Wallace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1954-05-21· cited 10×
- Columbia Bonding Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1972-02-07· cited 7×
- In Re: Rader Bonding Company, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2019-12-23
- Hicks v. Peoples L. S. Ass'nBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1902-01-15
- State of Tennessee v. Nathaniel Buchanan, In Re: McAdoo Bonding Company, SuretyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2025-08-27
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.