Skip to main content
· 6/8/1978

Goldsberry v. Hohn

Citations

  • 583 P.2d 1360
  • 120 Ariz. 40
  • 1978 Ariz. App. LEXIS 572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding denial of confirmation for award concerning the value of services because arbitration agreement’s primary subject was the contingent fee agreement’s validity, and party’s petition and testimony were confined to that issue
  • \[T]he object of arbitration is to finally dispose of differences between parties in a speedier and less expensive manner than normal court proceedings.\
  • “the object of arbitration is to finally dispose of differences between parties in a speedier and less expensive manner than normal court proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wren, Donofrio, Ogg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.