Goldman v. Tudor Apartments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing entry of summary judgment and holding that applicability of coverage would “depend on the finder of fact’s conclusions” as “to whether DeCoster’s conduct was intentionally wrongful under applicable tort law.”
• stating, “the duty to indemnify is not necessarily limited to the factual allegations of the underlying complaint[, rather], there must be a determination that the insurer's policy actually covers a claimed incident” (original quotation marks omitted, emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).