Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 6/9/1976
Goldman v. Roderiques
Citations
- 349 N.E.2d 335
- 370 Mass. 435
- 1976 Mass. LEXIS 999
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in making award of attorney’s fees, “the basic factors of need and relative economic positions of the spouses” must be considered
- When ruling on a request for attorney's fees, \the basic factors of need and relative economic positions of the spouses\ must be considered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Kaplan, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grubert v. GrubertMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-09-24· cited 80×
- Keller v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-08-21· cited 46×
- Robbins v. RobbinsMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-03-28· cited 40×
- Hunter v. RoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-09-28· cited 36×
- DeMatteo v. DeMatteoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-02-08· cited 32×
- Zildjian v. ZildjianMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-06-29· cited 29×
- LaFleur v. LaFleur (In Re LaFleur)D. Massachusetts· 1981-04-10· cited 28×
- Brash v. BrashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-03-20· cited 21×
- In Re MichaelsD. Massachusetts· 1993-07-23· cited 16×
- Doe v. RoeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-01-31· cited 16×
- Sinewitz v. Sinewitz (In Re Sinewitz)D. Massachusetts· 1994-04-29· cited 13×
- Soforenko v. Soforenko (In Re Soforenko)D. Massachusetts· 1997-01-07· cited 12×
- Kirtz v. KirtzMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-06-24· cited 12×
- In Re MacYD. Massachusetts· 1996-03-08· cited 10×
- Southern v. SouthernMissouri Court of Appeals· 1981-03-30· cited 4×
- Borgarello v. BorgarelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-04-07· cited 2×
- Macy v. Macy (In re Macy)D. Massachusetts· 1996-03-08· cited 1×
- McKnight v. FisherMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-02-06
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coe v. CoeSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 222×
- In the Matter of Roy Stewart Nunnally, Bankrupt. Mary Elizabeth Nunnally, Appellant-Cross v. Roy Stewart Nunnally, Appellee-CrossFifth Circuit· 1975-02-13· cited 102×
- Hayden v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1950-12-15· cited 65×
- Arlene M. Damon v. Cecil J. DamonFirst Circuit· 1960-10-28· cited 30×
- Jones v. TysonNinth Circuit· 1975-06-16· cited 30×
- Untersee v. UnterseeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1938-02-07· cited 19×
- Wallace v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1930-10-07· cited 18×
- Merriman v. HawbakerE.D. Illinois· 1934-01-02· cited 17×
- Coe v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1946-10-30· cited 16×
- Abrams v. BurgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-05-02· cited 12×
- In Re HargroveW.D. Missouri· 1973-08-10· cited 10×
- House v. HouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-06-11· cited 10×
- In Re HollisterS.D. New York· 1942-10-22· cited 9×
- Ross v. KeithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1933-06-20· cited 7×
- Densten v. DenstenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1932-06-29· cited 6×
- Dennis v. DennisMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1975-06-25· cited 4×
- In re HollisterSecond Circuit· 1943-01-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.