Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/31/1955
Goldman v. Quadrato
Citations
- 142 Conn. 398
- 114 A.2d 687
- 55 A.L.R. 2d 549
- 1955 Conn. LEXIS 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- land acquired by city on foreclosure of tax lien not devoted to public use
- \Whether possession is adverse in character is a question of fact.... Since the [trial] court found all the essential elements of an adverse possession... the court was correct in its judgment.\ [Citation omitted.]
- “A legal title perfected into a grant or vested by deed ... may never be lost by abandonment.... Title to realty does not pass merely through the inaction of its owner.” (footnote and citations omitted)
- “Whether possession is adverse in character is a question of fact... . Since the [trial] court found all the essential elements of an adverse possession . . . the court was correct in its judgment.” [Citation omitted.]
- by implication, tax title by foreclosure does not affect adverse possession
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Inglis, Baldwin, O'Sullivan, Wynne, Daly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Robinson v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-06-04· cited 54×
- Jarvis v. GillespieSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-01-18· cited 40×
- American Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. v. Town of TrumbullSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-05-15· cited 40×
- Meshberg v. Bridgeport City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-15· cited 32×
- Devins v. Borough of BogotaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-07-10· cited 28×
- Schaghticoke Tribe of Indians v. Kent School Corp.D. Connecticut· 1976-12-09· cited 24×
- Matto v. Dan Beard, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-08-16· cited 24×
- O'Connor v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-01· cited 23×
- Gallo-Mure v. TomchikConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-08-19· cited 18×
- Torch v. ConstantinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-04-03· cited 14×
- McGibney v. Waucoma Yacht Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-06-19· cited 12×
- Sandmaier v. Tahoe Development Group, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2005-12-23· cited 12×
- Broadhurst v. American Colloid CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1970-05-12· cited 11×
- Estado Libre Asociado v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1969-06-27· cited 9×
- Kempner v. Aetna Hose, Hook & Ladder Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1978-10-30· cited 8×
- Cornfield Point Ass'n v. Town of Old SaybrookConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-27· cited 7×
- Cristofani v. Board of EducationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-02· cited 7×
- Pioneer Home v. TaxHawkCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2019-12-27· cited 7×
- Town of Sandwich v. QuirkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-02-21· cited 6×
- Q-2 L.L.C. v. HughesUtah Supreme Court· 2016-02-16· cited 6×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Town of Derby v. AllingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1873-11-15· cited 69×
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-04-22· cited 42×
- Ames v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-02-24· cited 42×
- Padula v. PadulaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-07-10· cited 39×
- Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1937-07-29· cited 32×
- Norrell v. Augusta Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1902-08-09· cited 25×
- Savoie v. Town of BourbonnaisAppellate Court of Illinois· 1950-03-15· cited 22×
- Tissino v. MavrakisWyoming Supreme Court· 1951-02-20· cited 20×
- Walker v. PolkMississippi Supreme Court· 1950-02-13· cited 14×
- Long Island Land Research Bureau, Inc. v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1954-01-11· cited 10×
- Long Island Land Research Bureau Inc. v. Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court· 1952-10-29· cited 9×
- City & County of San Francisco v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-12-18· cited 9×
- Faulks v. SchriderD.C. Circuit· 1938-07-11· cited 9×
- Palmieri v. BulkleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1950-06-20· cited 7×
- City of Chicago v. MiddlebrookeIllinois Supreme Court· 1892-11-02· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.