Goldman v. Mahony

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• measure of damages where plaintiffs purchased house misrepresented to have no water problems was value of contractual bargain, i.e., “to have a house worth what the plaintiffs paid for it”
• plaintiffs entitled to “the benefit of their contractual bargain, if such damages are reasonably proved” [emphasis added]
• within discretion of judge to determine whether to refer to parts of evidence
• within discretion of judge to determine whether to refer to parts of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).