Goldman v. Langford & Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is the duty of the court to provide the necessary means for the defendant to communicate to the court
• Appointment of interpreter held to be discretionary matter for trial court; trial court's failure to appoint interpreter did not deprive defendant of constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).