Goldman v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that language in same Plan and Policy at issue here gave Hartford discretionary authority to determine entitlement to benefits, even where employer (also Halliburton) is listed as plan administrator
• noting that “Gilbert-son is not directly applicable to this case because that case involved an earlier version of the [DOL’s] regulations concerning the ERISA administrative review process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).