Goldman v. Century Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the requisite “meeting of the minds” must be “judge[d] by an objective standard, looking to the expressed words of the parties and their visible acts”
• “To say, as we do, that a contract requires a ‘meeting of the minds’ is only a figurative way of saying there must be mutual assent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).