Goldman v. Burch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “winning a motion for class certification or a motion to intervene would constitute a purely procedural victory”
• noting that \winning a motion for class certification or a motion to intervene would constitute a purely procedural victory\
• finding fee eligibility because defendant violated ERISA notice requirements and because claimant's suit was a catalyst for a beneficial change in the defendant's plan interpretation
• reducing fees-on- 22 fees in same 14.2% ratio as merits fees
• applying catalyst theory in awarding fees 19 in ERISA action
• “[T]he catalyst theory remains viable for purposes of § 1132(g)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).