Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. Blondis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that waiver of attorney-client privilege for conversation between defendant and his attorney “must be construed as limited to that specific subject during that particular conversation”
• “‘[T]he privilege of secret consultation is intended only as an incidental means of defense and not as an independent means of attack, and to use it in the latter character is to abandon it in the former”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).