Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The court evaluates “whether a reasonable mind could conclude that Commerce chose the best available information.”
• The court evaluates “whether a reasonable mind could conclude that Commerce chose the best available information.”
• “The Court’s role in the case at bar is not to evaluate whether the information Commerce used was the best available, but rather whether a reasonable mind could conclude that Commerce chose the best available information.”
• the court’s duty is “not to evaluate whether the information Commerce used was the best available, but rather whether a reasonable mind could conclude that Commerce chose the best available information.”
• plaintiff “requests that Commerce recalculate the cost of toll production by applying the financial ratios to the cost of materials, energy and labor Court No. 16-00244 Page 6 in the toll production process”
• “The Court’s role in the case at bar is not to evaluate whether the information Commerce used was the best available, but rather whether a reasonable mind could conclude that Commerce chose the best available information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).