Skip to main content
· 4/23/1990

Golding v. Ashley Central Irrigation Co.

Citations

  • 793 P.2d 897
  • 133 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1990 Utah LEXIS 31
  • 1990 WL 52781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that by not objecting to unpreserved affirmative defense, the plaintiff waived the defect
  • noting that by not objecting to unpreserved affirmative defense, the plaintiff waived the defect
  • reciting the facts on appellate review of the grant of a motion for judgment on the pleadings in accordance with this standard of review
  • finding willful misconduct where an actor knew about a dangerous condition from which serious injury was a probable result but failed to act
  • complaint alleged that defendant failed to maintain irrigation canal and to warn of its existence
  • motion for judgment on the pleadings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman, Hall, Howe, Durham, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.