Goldie Lavine v. Philip A. Shapiro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mere “anemic hope” that information contradicting deposition testimony will be elicited under cross-examination at trial is insufficient to withstand a motion for summary judgment
• “Plaintiff . . . had a right to express her feeling of hostility as well as her opinion of defendant in any way, at any place, at any time she saw fit, without being vulnerable to the charge that she directly or indirectly aided in the contest of the will.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).