Skip to main content
· 4/28/1992

Goldhirsh v. McNear

Citations

  • 590 N.E.2d 709
  • 32 Mass. App. Ct. 455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for board to determine whether change from one permitted use — carriage house — to another permitted use — single-family dwelling — will increase nonconformity
  • rejecting the notion that “there will never be an increase in a structure’s nonconforming nature where the proposed alterations are confined to the existing footprint”
  • question is whether proposed changes to nonconforming residential structure will increase nonconforming nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perretta, Porada, Laurence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.