· 4/28/1992
Goldhirsh v. McNear
Citations
- 590 N.E.2d 709
- 32 Mass. App. Ct. 455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for board to determine whether change from one permitted use — carriage house — to another permitted use — single-family dwelling — will increase nonconformity
- rejecting the notion that “there will never be an increase in a structure’s nonconforming nature where the proposed alterations are confined to the existing footprint”
- question is whether proposed changes to nonconforming residential structure will increase nonconforming nature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perretta, Porada, Laurence
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.