Goldgar v. Jetter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that allegation of “material misrepresentation” in procuring insurance policy was an averment of fraud
• “Existing and valid statutory provisions enter into and form a part of all contracts of insurance to which they are applicable, and, together with settled judicial constructions thereof, become a part of the contract as much as if they were actually incorporated therein[.]”
• “Existing and valid statutory provisions enter into and form a part of all contracts of insurance to which they are applicable, and, together with settled judicial constructions thereof, become a part of the contract as much as if they were actually incorporated therein.”
• “Plaintiff’s acceptance of premiums from [insured] after learning of the alleged fraud allowing for cancellation of the policies constituted . . . an estoppel against [ ] its rights to cancel or rescind the policies.”
• “Plaintiffs acceptance of premiums from Mobarak after learning of the alleged fraud allowing for cancelation of the policies constituted a waiver of (or more properly an estoppel against) its right to cancel or rescind the policies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).