Goldey v. Morning News
Citations
- 156 U.S. 518
- 15 S. Ct. 559
- 39 L. Ed. 517
- 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2157
Syllabus
<p>Section 1011 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by the act of February 18, 1875, c. 80, providing that there shall be no reversal by this court upon a writ of error “ for error in ruling any plea in abatement, other than a plea to the jurisdiction of the court,” does not forbid the review of a decision, even on a plea in abatement, of any question of the jurisdiction of the court below to render judgment against the defendant, though depending on the sufficiency of the service of the writ.</p> <p>In a personal action brought in a court of a State against a corporation which neither is incorporated nor does business within the State, nor has any agent or property therein, service of the summons lipón its president, temporarily within the jurisdiction, cannot be recognized as valid by the courts of any other government.</p> <p>A corporation sued in a personal action in a court of a State, within which • it is neither incorporated nor does business, nor has any agent or property, does not, by appearing specially in that court for the sole purpose of presenting a petition for the removal of the action into the Circuit Court of the United States, and by obtaining a removal accordingly, waive the right to object to the jurisdiction of the court for want of sufficient service of the summons.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that personal jurisdiction can be acquired over the defendant “by his waiver, by general appearance or otherwise”
- stating that personal jurisdiction can be acquired over the defendant “by his waiver, by general appearance or otherwise”
- stating that the state legislature and judiciary can neither defeat the congressionally conferred right to remove a case from state court to federal court, nor limit the effect of such removal
- stating that the state legislature and judiciary can neither defeat the congressionally conferred right to remove a case from state court to federal court, nor limit the effect of such removal
- “[T]he suit must be actually pending in the state court before it can be removed....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gray, After Stating the Case
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.